Censorship of Textbooks in Public Schools Essay

Censorship of Textbooks in Public Schools - Essay ExampleIndeed, while it is perhaps a precaution to protect a peasant from violent images, it becomes counterproductive to protect students from educational facts that exist only to enhance their learning experiences. The greatest line of credit for book censorship is the fact that children should not be subjected to certain topics. Some people even go as far as to say that there atomic number 18 some topics that a person of some(prenominal) age should not be aw be of (Edwards 29). School and public libraries, and even m all bookstores and distributors do not carry certain books, or else put them in a section that warns potential buyers that the books contain solid that is considered censor-worthy. Books ranging from The Catcher in the Rye to the beloved Harry Potter series have anchor themselves victims of censorship J.D. Salingers acclaimed novel for its adult subject matter, and J.K. Rowlings masterpiece due to its magical, im aginative content. In reply to this argument, those against censorship feel that it should be up to a parent to decide what their children should or should not be reading. For older children and teenagers, the choice should be their own. People on the outside of a family, like school teachers or librarians, should not be influencing a childs taste in reading because it prevents them from exploring the world through books. In regard to the censoring of textual matters, parents find it ridiculous that facts should be considered horrid enough that others have found a need to censor them at all (Sherrow 15). Information provided to students in a school setting, controlled by a teacher and a textbook, can hardly be considered dangerous to the students. When a subject is creation taught in schools, it is due to the fact that the subject serves a purpose, whether as simply knowledge or to assist further a childs education. If certain information is being censored, children are being d enied zippy intelligence in many cases, children are given false information to make up for the need of truth (Kravitz 147). This causes students to be misinformed, which can bring about negative impacts years down the road, like when the students are preparing for higher education. If the information they learned during their time in public schools is incorrect or else missing, these students risk locomote further behind in their later studies. It should not be up to a teacher or school administration if a topic should not be covered by the school. Textbooks are written based on grade and age level, providing information that specific age groups should be taught (Brown 82). If these books pass adulation as textbooks for public schools, then, upon being bought, they should be entirely implemented in the classroom. Unless the information presented in the textbook is inaccurate, there is no reason that the textbooks should be censored. They are not providing students with dangero us information or ideas, nor are they presenting students with lies or false facts. They serve the purpose of teaching children vital information. Censoring school textbooks have to a greater extent negative effects than positive. In fact, many textbook writers and teachers alike are unable to find any positive effects of censoring textbooks.