After reading the novel "Of Mice And Men", by John Steinbeck, do you think George Milton should be found guilty of the murder of Lennie Small?

Anyone would help their best sponsor if they needed some jack, gain what if they needed to be define to rest? George Milton is not guilty for the slay of his friend, Lennie Small, in the unexampled Of Mica and Men by John Steinbeck. George should be proved exonerated because of three reasons; Curley would hap brutally murdered Lennie, George had to compass point Lennie from unintentionally hurting others, and it was Georges function to end Lennies derogatory life. If George did not protrude Lennie in the easy way he did, wherefore Curley would have murdered him in a pugnacious and hero way that was filled with indignation. On page 96, Curley retorted, Ill kill the orotund son-of-a- buffalo chipch myself. Ill shoot im in the guts. This pertain shows that Curley was going out to murder Lennie. Also, it shows that George knew Curley was going to murder him painfully, so George knew he had to originate it everyplace with humanely. The second reason George is impartial is that if he did not do what he did, the number of Lennies inadvertent victims would continue to add up. On page nine, Lennie said, They was so little. Id greet em, and pretty soon they bit my fingers and I pinched their heads a little and then they was dead---because they was so little.

In this quote you soak up that whenever the soft involvement that Lennie had writhed, contorted, or cringed, he wiped out(p) it. He has done it to mice, puppies, and women. So, George had to give notice Lennie from doing these things, even if they were accidents. The most great evidence is that George is the only individual who had a right to kill Lennie, so it was not murder. On page 61, Candy stated, I ought to of rotating shaft that dog... If you want to get a full essay, post it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper