In the 1952 film East of Eden, handler and darshan Elia Kazan attempts to resolve the hefty tension in the Cain and Abel account by depicting Cal as a sympathetic character. The ambiguity of the biblical account is honest for much of this tension. God does non offer a antecedent for accepting Abels gift and rejecting Cains. incomplete of the br others defy a candid per male childality, and so the motivation for the mangle is left to speculation. Why is Cains penalty seemingly mitigated and what should the lecturer draw from the story? Kazan and Steinbeck to line upher sort through such(prenominal) problems, using their imaginations to fill in textbookual gaps and formulating an interpretation pertinent to their day. Why would God favor Abel and not Cain? This is the biggest problem for Kazan and Steinbeck. Unfortunately, the biblical text does not provide a clear answer, so they mustiness come up with one(a) on their own. Perhaps the curb itself was bad. After ten loses or so all of his coin, Cal employs it upon himself to give back his mystify. Anticipating World War I, the son invests five thousand dollars in beans and upon the wars arrival, bean prices skyrocket. Ecstatic, Cal plans to surprise his obtain with the money for his birthday.
When that long pass judgment day arrives, Aron informs Adam of his encounter to Abra and his father is thrilled. On the other hand, when Cal presents the money to his father, he replies, Do you speculate I could take a profit from that?...I dont privation that money. regular(a) though his intentions were good, because the money came from the war, Adam refuses to accept it, breaking his sons heart. Thus, Kazan and Steinbeck have formulated a case for Gods behavior. Apparently, Cains gift originated from a chapped source whereas Abels was pure... If you want to get a full essay, pelf it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment